If you’ve read Marc’s post below, you know that the Parent Trigger is going to be well represented. Of course, I couldn’t help post something similar, but I take a slightly different tack on some of the points.
Reading, or re-reading Alexander Russo’s post might provide context.
Before I go any further, please help Marc and me become the best advocates we can for this idea. Comment away on your thoughts. Throw the kitchen sink at us. Also, please come back and visit this page often to find out who’s doing what on the trigger.
(1) Collateral Damage – The existing system has created decades of “collateral damage,” and it is time to change the dynamic. We need to take power away from the “Government Education Complex” and give it to parents and citizens. The results won’t be perfect, but it’s nearly impossible they do worse and very likely that they do better than the complex.
As to your point about turnarounds and transformations, I’m in full agreement with you. They are expensive and mostly fruitless. That’s why Heartland’s Policy Brief on the Parent Trigger called for more robust uses of parental empowerment.
(2) Scapegoated – I feel for the plight of teachers, but only up to a point. Those that live by the Union model will die by it. If you have one blanket contract that ties everyone to one “time-served” seniority-based system, and fill that system with anyone that can maintain a pulse through the pre-tenure hazing project, don’t expect to have the same stature as Finnish teachers do.
Furthermore, the rights of entire class of under-served children and over-taxed citizens far outweigh the rights of a powerful and protected class of teachers or administrators. Citizen anger is more righteous than anger generated by the system that has been very well protected and well compensated for decades.
(3) Reforms Failed? Fair minded people might concede that no reform is a silver bullet. However, that only goes to support the case for the Parent Trigger. We have decades of increased spending and attenuated reforms (limited choice, limited charters, caps, etc.). What we haven’t done is change the political dynamic. It is time to empower an entirely different group and dis-empower the people who got us here. The Parent Trigger starts that process. It isn’t a silver bullet, but it gives parents more ammunition than they’ve yet had.
(4) Ravitch v. Klein & Rhee – Diane Ravitich lives in a “Finnish Model” thought-world that bears no resemblance to the the sea of mediocrity created by our district-based, union-driven, spending-engorged “Government Education Complex”.
If we split the US at the Mississippi and made Ravitch Queen of the East to impose her system, allowed me to be King of the West to impose the Swedish “money follow the child” system, I’d be more than happy to measure the outcomes. Neither of those thought-worlds are going to happen. If Finland is the answer, let Diane try and persuade her new Union Friends to impose that level of content and performance on America’s union workforce.
Ravitch has simply given up, while Klein and Rhee are still in the fight.
(5) Jobs and Economy – The economy is the number one reason to support transformational reforms like the Parent Trigger, Choice, and Digital Learning.
The current system is not only a failure, but it can’t succeed at any funding level because its entire structure is designed to reshuffle deck chairs while adding payroll. They’ve had 25-30 years on the gravy train. The fastest way to increase educational employment and dynamism is to kill the current employment model and create a vast new array of content providers and delivery systems.
(6) Authenticity!? – I don’t know about you, but if authenticity is the standard, I’ll take Ben Austin over Randi Weingarten any day.
I’ve met enough oily suburban superintendents to know lack of authenticity when I see it. Austin comes across to me as a dedicated reformer, and I frankly could care less who funds him.
We get that “Who’s funding Heartland” question all the time, and it’s about as lame an attack as there is. We’ve been as open an honest about our reform agenda, and we love the Parent Trigger. If a group of philanthropists are out there trying to change the education system, good for them. They should call me, and I’ll tell them where they can send us a check.
(7) The Media – Any organization or outlet that believes the current system can be “reformed” doesn’t understand the system, nor politics, nor economics.
(8) Direct Democracy – This is probably the most effective critique, and even it falls short when compared to the existing system. “Manipulation” is exactly what has happened with the current system, which has been influenced from the beginning by powerful, organized, and self-interested forces.
Along come a few reformers, using the Parent Trigger and “community organizing” to “manipulate” the electorate, parents, and citizens in FAVOR of transforming schools, and the incumbent system starts crying foul over tactics they’ve used for decades. Deal with it.
In closing, outrage against the existing system it is justified. The good news is that it just may be on its last legs.
If anyone living in 1985 had said that the USSR would cease to exist in five years, they would have been laughed at.
I’ve been saying that that if our education system – the Government Education Complex – falls, it will fall quickly. It will appear unassailable up until it simply collapses of its own weight, expense, and internal contradictions. I think that is starting to happen, and I think the Parent Trigger is an idea that will accelerate that process. That is why it deserves support.
Merry Christmas, everyone.