• Reasonable People
    • Joe Bast
    • Jim Lakely
    • David Applegate
    • Kendall Antekeier
    • Diane Carol Bast
    • Drew Banks
    • Andrew Barr
    • Bruno Behrend
    • Ben Boychuk
    • Alan Caruba
    • Edmund Contoski
    • Peter Ferrara
    • Matthew Glans
    • Jim Johnston
    • Jay Lehr
    • Maureen Martin
    • John Nothdurft
    • Joy Pullmann
    • James H. Rust
    • Harrison Schmitt
    • Taylor Smith
    • James M. Taylor
    • Rich Trzupek
    • Bruce Edward Walker
  • The Heartland Institute
  • Heartlander Magazine

Somewhat Reasonable

  • FacebookFacebook
  • TwitterTwitter
  • YoutubeYoutube
  • RSSRSS
  • itunesitunes
  • Budgets/Taxes
  • Environment/Energy
  • Education
  • Finance/Insurance/Real Estate
  • Health Care
  • Internet/Telecom
  • Legal Affairs

0

Economics · Politics · Taxes

Obama’s ‘Wealth’ Benchmark Hurts the Middle Class the Most

  • by Steve Stanek
  • May 13, 2011
Tweet

This piece ran in The Detroit News the other day — and thanks to them for running it:

Consider a two-income family of public school teachers each earning about $60,000 a year. With a combined income of $120,000, are they “the wealthy”?

Most people probably would say they are not. But based on the current federal tax system, most people would be wrong.

With that combined income this husband-wife schoolteacher couple would be well into the top 10 percent of U.S. earners. Just $113,800 of earnings puts a two-income family in the top 10 percent, based on 2008 IRS and census data, the most recent available. The top 10 percent of wage earners in this nation currently pay nearly 70 percent of all federal income taxes, according to the nonpartisan Tax Foundation.

To be in the top 5 percent, a couple would have to earn about $159,000. The top 5 percent pay nearly 59 percent of all federal income taxes while having less than 35 percent of the nation’s taxable income.

The threshold to reach the top 1 percent — the people President Obama and others have targeted in calls to tax the rich more — is about $380,000 a year. This top 1 percent has about 20 percent of the nation’s annual earnings and pays 38 percent of the federal income tax bill.

Meanwhile, the bottom 50 percent, who have about 13 percent of national earnings, pay just 2.7 percent of the federal income tax bill.

In 1980, the top 1 percent paid 19 percent of the federal income tax bill, and the bottom 50 percent paid 7 percent. Yet we hear that our tax system favors the wealthy. Compared to when? Certainly not any time over the past 30 years.

Astonishingly, 45 percent of all income tax returns filed this year will owe no federal income tax, according to the Tax Policy Center.

Some supporters of the current income tax system protest that those in the bottom 50 percent do pay payroll taxes for Social Security and Medicare.

In many instances, however, the money they get back more than offsets the taxes they paid for Social Security and Medicare, according to Jason Fichtner, a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.

Bear all this in mind when Obama and others call for higher taxes on “the wealthy” and the elimination of “loopholes” such as the mortgage interest deduction and possibly employer-funded health insurance.

Remember a speech he gave while campaigning for president on Sept. 12, 2008, in Dover, N.H.: “I can make a firm pledge. Under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increases. Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes.”

Too bad for the tens of millions of people who earn less than $250,000. President Obama apparently has forgotten the pledge of Candidate Obama. Get ready for more tax hikes on the middle class.

 

Tags: income taxpayroll taxtax policywealthy

— Steve Stanek

Steve Stanek is a research fellow at The Heartland Institute and managing editor of two Heartland publications, Budget & Tax News and Finance, Insurance & Real Estate News. He has been writing and editing for Heartland since 2003. Stanek's work has appeared in numerous local, state and national publications including The Wall Street Journal, USA Today, Investor's Business Daily, Crain's Chicago Business, Chicago Sun-Times, The Hill, Boston Herald, New York Post, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, and Washington Examiner, and he has appeared on radio and television programs including Chicago Public Television's Chicago Tonight and the CBS Evening News with Katie Couric.

  • Previous story House Pushes Back at Obama’s Oil Drilling Moratorium
  • Next story Montana Superintendent Defies Feds on NCLB

    Related Posts

  • Cain’s Tax Plan May Work without a National Sales Tax Cain’s Tax Plan May Work without a National Sales Tax October 19, 2011
  • phil_trophy_story Phil Mickelson Earned His Money and Should Retract His Apology About Taxes January 22, 2013
  • Policies Meant To Achieve Equality Are Very Unfair To The Least Equal Policies Meant To Achieve Equality Are Very Unfair To The Least Equal December 1, 2012
  • Obamataxesferrara Obama and the Pirates February 17, 2013
  • Reasonable People

    Publisher/PresidentEditor-in-Chief
    Joe BastJim Lakely
    Contributors
    David ApplegateRalf Mangual
    Dave BanksMaureen Martin
    Diane Carol BastSeton Motley
    Alan CarubaJohn Nothdurft
    Paul ChesserJoy Pullmann
    Edmund ContoskiJames H. Rust
    Benjamin DomenechHarrison Schmitt
    Peter FerraraAlexandra Shanahan
    Matthew GlansTaylor Smith
    Jim JohnstonSteve Stanek
    Jay LehrJames M. Taylor
    S.T. KarnickBruce Edward Walker
  • Heartland on YouTube

    • Joseph Bast & Herbert Walberg: Education and Capitalism
      Joseph Bast & Herbert Walberg: Education and Capitalism
    • John Lott: At the Brink: Will Obama Push Us Over the Edge?
      John Lott: At the Brink: Will Obama Push Us Over the Edge?
    • Heartland
      Heartland's Jay Lehr on the Today Show: C02 Emissions (400 ppm)
  • RSS Somewhat Readable Links

    • iPencil | National Review Online
    • Eagle Scout Faces Felony for Honest Mistake
    • James Bovard: A Brief History of IRS Political Targeting - WSJ.com
    • The IRS Scandal: the Future of Big Government Is Now « Commentary Magazine
    • Lessons from the IRS scandal | Power Line
    • On the AP-Justice Department Story - Ricochet.com
    • Emptyage — Generation X Doesn't Want to Hear It
  • Obamacare Disaster
  • Tag Cloud

    2012 election al gore Barack-Obama budget California Chicago climate change climategate Congress debt ceiling economics economy education energy policy environment environmental protection agency EPA FCC federal budget federal communications commission fracking global warming green energy health care Heartland Institute internet liberty Medicaid Medicare Mitt Romney Obama Obamacare Paul Ryan politics Public Unions regulation school-reform scott walker Supreme Court Taxes teachers unions tea party unions Wisconsin Wisconsin protests
  • Heartland Websites

    The Heartland Institute
    The Heartlander
    Climate Conferences
    ClimateWiki
    Policybot
    The Parent Trigger
    Fakegate (Peter Gleick)

  • Heartland News

    Budget and Tax News
    Environment and Climate News
    FIRE Policy News
    Health Care News
    Infotech and Telecom News
    School Reform News
    Lawsuit Abuse

  • Get Reasonable

    About Us
    DONATE
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Youtube

  • Budgets/Taxes
  • Environment/Energy
  • Education
  • FIRE
  • Health Care
  • Internet/Telecom
  • Legal Affairs
  • FacebookFacebook
  • TwitterTwitter
  • YoutubeYoutube
  • RSSRSS
  • itunesitunes

Copyright The Heartland Institute