• Reasonable People
    • Joe Bast
    • Jim Lakely
    • David Applegate
    • Kendall Antekeier
    • Diane Carol Bast
    • Drew Banks
    • Andrew Barr
    • Bruno Behrend
    • Ben Boychuk
    • Alan Caruba
    • Edmund Contoski
    • Peter Ferrara
    • Matthew Glans
    • Jim Johnston
    • Jay Lehr
    • Maureen Martin
    • John Nothdurft
    • Joy Pullmann
    • James H. Rust
    • Harrison Schmitt
    • Taylor Smith
    • James M. Taylor
    • Rich Trzupek
    • Bruce Edward Walker
  • The Heartland Institute
  • Heartlander Magazine

Somewhat Reasonable

  • FacebookFacebook
  • TwitterTwitter
  • YoutubeYoutube
  • RSSRSS
  • itunesitunes
  • Budgets/Taxes
  • Environment/Energy
  • Education
  • Finance/Insurance/Real Estate
  • Health Care
  • Internet/Telecom
  • Legal Affairs

2

Politics · Taxes

Bah Humbug

  • by Maureen Martin
  • November 9, 2011
Tweet

The news just broke on the Obama administration’s decision to “delay” and “revisit” its new tax on the sale of Christmas trees.

I’m seriously bummed because the tax, announced Tuesday, was such a gift. It was the perfect symbol of governmental incompetence.

First, the 15-cent tax on Christmas trees is just the latest example of crony capitalism aimed at aiding one industry segment – fresh trees – against another – artificial trees.

Various “fresh” Christmas tree trade associations asked the U.S. Department of Agriculture for a federally-mandated tax to bolster sales through advertising and research. Fresh tree sales have been hard hit by artificial Christmas tree sales, declining from 37 million trees in 1991 to 31 million in 2007. The federal program also promotes other products such as beef and milk.

Second, the tax laid bare governmental hypocrisy. The display of Christmas trees in government buildings is routinely vilified as an unconstitutional comingling of church and state. Republican Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin became just the latest victim Monday, when he insisted on calling the tree in the state capitol a “Christmas Tree,” rather than the politically-correct “Holiday Tree.”

So now we know. Given a choice between expanding the scope of Big Government and hewing to supposedly cherished constitutional principles, the Obama administration picked Big Government.

Third, the tax is imposed on sales of “Christmas Trees.” What, exactly, is a Christmas Tree? The federal regulations say a “Christmas Tree” is, well, a “Christmas Tree.” Quoting directly: “Christmas tree means any tree of the coniferous species, that is severed or cut from its roots and marketed as a Christmas tree for holiday use.”

Just imagine the tax collection complications. If producers market their product as “Holiday Trees” – wink, wink, nudge, nudge – then no tax would be due. Nor would a tax be due for a Hanukkah Bush or a Kwansaa Tree, though these look just like “Christmas Trees.”

Obama decided to “defer” the tax for political reasons, according to one blog:

The 15-cents per-tree fee is supposed to help market real Christmas Trees instead of fake ones. Other industries have similar fees that pay for programs for meat, poultry and cotton, according to this article with the snappy headline “A fee on thee, oh Christmas tree.”

Puns like this are inevitable. And that’s what makes this so potentially troublesome for Obama. It’s the stuff of jokes. Add in the chuckle factor, penny-ante nature of the fee, the perennial ‘war-on-Christmas’ jihad of the right and the sentiment of Christmas, and we’re sure to soon see jpegs of Obama painted like the grinch.

But there’s always next year.

Tags: Christmas Tree TaxgrinchObama

— Maureen Martin

Maureen Martin is The Heartland Institute's senior fellow for legal affairs. Formerly a newspaper reporter, she became an attorney and has practiced law for nearly 30 years, generally concentrating in litigation and environmental law. She was an adjunct professor of environmental law at Loyola University Chicago for more than 10 years. Her op-eds have been published in the Wall Street Journal, Investor’s Business Daily, the Washington Times, the Chicago Sun-Times, and the Chicago Tribune, among others. Her favorite lawyer joke: “What’s the difference between a carp and a lawyer?” Answer: “One’s a scum-sucking bottom feeder; the other’s just a fish.”

  • Previous story “Rick Rolling” A Bipartisan Accomplishment in Oregon
  • Next story Heartland’s Podcasts of the Week

    Related Posts

  • Ferrara at Forbes.com: Obama’s Perfect Plan For The Economic Decline Of America Ferrara at Forbes.com: Obama’s Perfect Plan For The Economic Decline Of America June 27, 2012
  • obamafairshare Obama Again Picking Private Sector Losers at the Expense of Winners April 17, 2013
  • The Energy Issue, Republicans and Obama The Energy Issue, Republicans and Obama June 14, 2011
  • whpc Turning on Obama — Could it Be That the Liberal Press has Finally Figured Him Out? May 9, 2013
  • http://www.heartland.org/ The Heartland Institute

    This tax idea is not only stupid, it is unnecessary. Most industries have a professional association, which collect dues from members to advance the interests of the group — mostly PR and lobbying — in exchange for the “official seal of approval.” The National Christmas Tree Association (Yes, there is one: http://www.christmastree.org/) could collect 15 cents per tree sold by members and spend the money on commercials and advertisements extolling the virtues of REAL Christmas trees. No tax or federal bureaucrats needed.

    Yes, the higher prices would be passed on to consumers (as always), but the middle-man of government would be eliminated — meaning the collection and spending of the money would be more efficient. And most consumers would also be none the wiser … or not mind paying 15 cents more from a tree dealer “endorsed by the National Christmas Tree Association.”And the publicity with the voluntary fees would be on top of the GOBS of free advertising real Christmas trees get in countless commercials for other products during the season — not to mention the news stories about the delivery and lighting of the National Christmas Tree on the White House lawn, the one delivered and lit in front of the U.S. Capitol, and the iconic tradition of lighting the REAL Christmas tree at Rockefeller Center in New York City.

    This idea was so dumb on so many levels. The federal government has no business being the fee collector for the National Christmas Tree Association. What the heck is the association doing with their dues, anyway? If I was a dues-paying Christmas tree dealer, I’d be writing a letter to Chesterfield, Missouri right about now.

    Jim Lakely
    Director of Communications
    The Heartland Institute

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NSEFQ7N7ZZ6SPZYYG74232NMFE Artificial

    Really this is sad, what the heck government thinks  about, come on this is children’s fest. and they are  thinking  to earn money from this.! 

    http://www.artificialplantsandtrees.com/artificial-christmas-trees.html

  • Reasonable People

    Publisher/PresidentContributing Editors
    Joe BastDiane Carol Bast
    Bruno Behrend
    Editor-in-ChiefBen Boychuk
    Jim LakelyBenjamin Domenech
    Contributors
    David ApplegateS.T. Karnick
    Dave BanksMaureen Martin
    Alan CarubaJohn Nothdurft
    Paul ChesserJoy Pullmann
    Edmund ContoskiJames H. Rust
    Keely DrukalaHarrison Schmitt
    Peter FerraraTaylor Smith
    Matthew GlansSteve Stanek
    Jim JohnstonJames M. Taylor
    Jay LehrBruce Edward Walker
  • Heartland on YouTube

    • Joseph Bast & Herbert Walberg: Education and Capitalism
      Joseph Bast & Herbert Walberg: Education and Capitalism
    • John Lott: At the Brink: Will Obama Push Us Over the Edge?
      John Lott: At the Brink: Will Obama Push Us Over the Edge?
    • Heartland
      Heartland's Jay Lehr on the Today Show: C02 Emissions (400 ppm)
  • RSS Somewhat Readable Links

    • iPencil | National Review Online
    • Eagle Scout Faces Felony for Honest Mistake
    • James Bovard: A Brief History of IRS Political Targeting - WSJ.com
    • The IRS Scandal: the Future of Big Government Is Now « Commentary Magazine
    • Lessons from the IRS scandal | Power Line
    • On the AP-Justice Department Story - Ricochet.com
    • Emptyage — Generation X Doesn't Want to Hear It
  • Obamacare Disaster
  • Tag Cloud

    2012 election al gore Barack-Obama budget California Chicago climate change climategate Congress debt ceiling economics economy education energy policy environment environmental protection agency EPA FCC federal budget fracking global warming green energy health care Heartland Institute internet liberty Medicaid Medicare Mitt Romney Obama Obamacare Paul Ryan Peter Ferrara politics Public Unions regulation school-reform scott walker Supreme Court Taxes teachers unions tea party unions Wisconsin Wisconsin protests
  • Heartland Websites

    The Heartland Institute
    The Heartlander
    Climate Conferences
    ClimateWiki
    Policybot
    The Parent Trigger
    Fakegate (Peter Gleick)

  • Heartland News

    Budget and Tax News
    Environment and Climate News
    FIRE Policy News
    Health Care News
    Infotech and Telecom News
    School Reform News
    Lawsuit Abuse

  • Get Reasonable

    About Us
    DONATE
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Youtube

  • Budgets/Taxes
  • Environment/Energy
  • Education
  • FIRE
  • Health Care
  • Internet/Telecom
  • Legal Affairs
  • FacebookFacebook
  • TwitterTwitter
  • YoutubeYoutube
  • RSSRSS
  • itunesitunes

Copyright The Heartland Institute