• Reasonable People
    • Joe Bast
    • Jim Lakely
    • David Applegate
    • Kendall Antekeier
    • Diane Carol Bast
    • Drew Banks
    • Andrew Barr
    • Bruno Behrend
    • Ben Boychuk
    • Alan Caruba
    • Edmund Contoski
    • Peter Ferrara
    • Matthew Glans
    • Jim Johnston
    • Jay Lehr
    • Maureen Martin
    • John Nothdurft
    • Joy Pullmann
    • James H. Rust
    • Harrison Schmitt
    • Taylor Smith
    • James M. Taylor
    • Rich Trzupek
    • Bruce Edward Walker
  • The Heartland Institute
  • Heartlander Magazine

Somewhat Reasonable

  • FacebookFacebook
  • TwitterTwitter
  • YoutubeYoutube
  • RSSRSS
  • itunesitunes
  • Budgets/Taxes
  • Environment/Energy
  • Education
  • Finance/Insurance/Real Estate
  • Health Care
  • Internet/Telecom
  • Legal Affairs

2

Environment/Energy · Media

Anticipating Unfair Treatment of Skeptics in Tonight’s PBS Frontline Special ‘Climate of Doubt’

  • by Joe Bast
  • October 23, 2012
Tweet

Tonight, PBS’s “Frontline” program will broadcast a special titled “Climate of Doubt.” It promises to go “inside the organizations” that helped turn the tide of public opinion, and then of elected officials, away from excessive concern over the possible threat of man-made global warming. (It airs at 10 p.m. on WTTW here in Chicago.)

The Heartland Institute is likely to be a central figure in this program as we welcomed “Frontline” producer Catherine Upin and her crew to our Seventh International Conference on Climate Change in Chicago in May. Heartland Institute Senior Fellow James M. Taylor also gave a three-hour interview to the film crew in August. Earlier this year, The Economist called Heartland “the world’s most prominent think tank promoting skepticism about man-made climate change.”

We hope the program is accurate and fair, but past experience both with PBS and other mainstream media outlets leads us to predict it will be neither. Several Heartland staff will be watching the program and commenting live via Twitter and on our blog, Somewhat Reasonable.

Meanwhile, here are some facts to keep in mind when watching this program: 

  • There is no “scientific consensus” about how much the planet has warmed, how much of the warming may be due to human activity, whether the warming has had positive or negative consequences, or what should be done about it. These are all hotly contested issues in the scientific, economic, and public policy communities.
  • The best scientific data show there has been no warming for 16 years, something none of the computer models that predict an eco-catastrophe predicted or can explain. Data show no connection between man-made emissions of carbon dioxide and extreme weather events such as hurricanes, tornadoes, or floods. Natural variation in climate readily explains the small changes in temperature that occurred in the twentieth century. Global warming, simply put, is not a crisis.
  • The more scientists explore climate, the more they realize how small the human impact can be. But the global warming movement – the environmental activists, “green” businesses, politicians, and even the researchers – has strong financial motives to deny that the science behind their cause, never strong to begin with, is now collapsing.
  • The Heartland Institute emerged as a major voice in the international debate over climate change about seven years ago when we observed a lack of balance in the mainstream media’s coverage of the climate debate. We challenged Al Gore to debate his critics, and he never did. We documented errors in his documentary film, “An Inconvenient Truth,” but he refused to correct them. We identified scores and then hundreds of scientists whose important work on the issue was being ignored – actually censored – by reporters in the mainstream media and published their work.
  • In 2009 and 2011 we published two volumes in a series titled Climate Change Reconsidered that comprehensively refutes the reports of the alarmist Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Our reports, which cite thousands of scientific articles published in peer-reviewed journals, have never been refuted by alarmists because they cannot be refuted: They cite the published research of many scientists who self-identify as alarmists in the debate, but whose own research finds evidence of only a small or even nonexistent human impact on climate. After repeated scandals involving the IPCC, Climate Change Reconsidered stands as the most authoritative overview of the science of climate change now available.
  • Because of our leadership role in opposing global warming alarmism, Heartland has been mercilessly attacked and demonized by environmental groups and their allies in the mainstream media. We’ve even had our corporate documents stolen and our donors subjected to fake petitions demanding they stop funding us. The mainstream media has participated in these attacks in a clear violation of journalistic ethics.

For the record, The Heartland Institute has been advocating free-market solutions to social and economic problems for 28 years. We address a wide range of topics, not just climate change. We are supported by approximately 5,000 donors. We never take positions to satisfy our donors; donors support us because they agree with the positions we take. No corporation gives more than 5 percent of our annual budget. We have been endorsed by many of the world’s leading think tank leaders, elected officials, and policy experts.

Tags: climate changeclimate of doubtFrontlineglobal warmingHeartland Institutepbs

— Joe Bast

Joseph Bast is president and CEO of The Heartland Institute. Bast is the coauthor of 12 books, including Rebuilding America's Schools (1990), Why We Spend Too Much on Health Care (1992), Eco-Sanity: A Common-Sense Guide to Environmentalism (1994), and Education & Capitalism (2003). His writing has appeared in Phi Delta Kappan, Economics of Education Review, Wall Street Journal, Investor’s Business Daily, The Cato Journal, USA Today, and many of the country’s largest-circulation newspapers.

  • Previous story Heartland Institute Fellows, Policy Advisors React to Final Presidential Debate
  • Next story Biden’s Lack of Conscience

    Related Posts

  • John-Kerry-climate-change Can Global Warmists Get Their Story Straight? March 5, 2013
  • Reality: Global Warming Alarmists Left Out in the Cold Reality: Global Warming Alarmists Left Out in the Cold June 15, 2011
  • Green Groups are Campaign Contributors, Too Green Groups are Campaign Contributors, Too October 27, 2010
  • Analyzing the 3 Cs: COPs, Crime, and the Climate Negotiations Analyzing the 3 Cs: COPs, Crime, and the Climate Negotiations November 16, 2012
  • Scott

    No scientific consensus? This view seems to ignore the facts as I read them. Then again perhaps you are correct, perhaps it is nothing more than a hoax. If your goal is solely to create a degree of uncertainty then you have succeeded. But for now you are severely in the scientific minority and your ethics are questionable at best with the billboard fiasco being a perfect example. Perhaps it would be beneficial if Joe Bast would publicly debate Joe Romm to further educate us. Has that been considered? Really what is your motivation? Simply free market conservatism? Personally, I think you have done a disservice to the debate. In any event I will continue to plumb the depths. For now your position does not appear to be credible and the question remains, what if you are wrong? Do you think about that at 3 am? And if you are how should you be remembered? Well, we will see…perhaps not us individually of course. I guess that’s the main problem with your position, it seems so….shortsighted. In the end I do feel that we all want the best for future generations, so I’m optimistic in that regard. One thing is for sure, whomever is wrong on this issue will be a pariah for all time especially if great suffering results.

    • http://www.heartland.org/ The Heartland Institute

      Our goal is not exactly to “create a degree of uncertainty,” but to make the obvious point — if you click through to the links below, for starters — that the scientific data on what his happening in our climate is far from certain.

      Our motivation is simply to give a venue to scientists who have examined the data and have determined that the alarmist position is wrong. You — and David Stachon — might want to open you minds to that idea and think for yourself.

      BTW: Joe Bast and Heartland has always opened our climate conferences to those who disagree with the alarmist position. Few have accepted the challenge, including Romm. We do not shrink from debate. The other side does — and a scientist from the “other side,” Scott Denning of Colorado State University, thinks it’s a shame.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkL6TDIaCVw

      Read and watch more, and learn.

      http://heartland.org/policy-documents/climate-change-reconsidered

      http://heartland.org/policy-documents/climate-change-reconsidered-2011-interim-report

      http://climateconferences.heartland.org/

  • Reasonable People

    Publisher/PresidentEditor-in-Chief
    Joe BastJim Lakely
    Contributors
    David ApplegateRalf Mangual
    Dave BanksMaureen Martin
    Diane Carol BastSeton Motley
    Alan CarubaJohn Nothdurft
    Paul ChesserJoy Pullmann
    Edmund ContoskiJames H. Rust
    Benjamin DomenechHarrison Schmitt
    Peter FerraraAlexandra Shanahan
    Matthew GlansTaylor Smith
    Jim JohnstonSteve Stanek
    Jay LehrJames M. Taylor
    S.T. KarnickBruce Edward Walker
  • Heartland on YouTube

    • Keith Koeneman: The Biography of Richard M. Daley
      Keith Koeneman: The Biography of Richard M. Daley
    • Joseph Bast & Herbert Walberg: Education and Capitalism
      Joseph Bast & Herbert Walberg: Education and Capitalism
    • John Lott: At the Brink: Will Obama Push Us Over the Edge?
      John Lott: At the Brink: Will Obama Push Us Over the Edge?
  • RSS Somewhat Readable Links

    • If Obama Were a CEO, the DOJ Would Hold Him Responsible for Scandals
    • DOJ vs. School Choice | Cato @ Liberty
    • The More One Delves into the IRS Scandal, the Worse It Gets - Ricochet.com
    • Crovitz: Big Government Loses Control - WSJ.com
    • IRS cast an even wider net for conservative groups than previously revealed
    • Firefly & Lessons in Contract Law | The Legal Geeks
  • Obamacare Disaster
  • Tag Cloud

    2012 election al gore Barack-Obama budget California Chicago climate change climategate Congress debt ceiling economics education energy policy environment environmental protection agency EPA FCC federal budget federal communications commission federal spending fracking global warming green energy health care Heartland Institute internet liberty Medicaid Medicare Mitt Romney Obama Obamacare Paul Ryan politics Public Unions regulation ronald reagan school-reform scott walker Supreme Court Taxes teachers unions tea party Wisconsin Wisconsin protests
  • Heartland Websites

    The Heartland Institute
    The Heartlander
    Climate Conferences
    ClimateWiki
    Policybot
    The Parent Trigger
    Fakegate (Peter Gleick)

  • Heartland News

    Budget and Tax News
    Environment and Climate News
    FIRE Policy News
    Health Care News
    Infotech and Telecom News
    School Reform News
    Lawsuit Abuse

  • Get Reasonable

    About Us
    DONATE
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Youtube

  • Budgets/Taxes
  • Environment/Energy
  • Education
  • FIRE
  • Health Care
  • Internet/Telecom
  • Legal Affairs
  • FacebookFacebook
  • TwitterTwitter
  • YoutubeYoutube
  • RSSRSS
  • itunesitunes

Copyright The Heartland Institute