He is author of What Climate Scientists Think about Global Warming (Heartland Institute, 2007) and coauthor of State Greenhouse Gas Programs: An Economic and Scientific Analysis (Heartland Institute, 2003) and New Source Review: An Evaluation of EPA's Reform Recommendations (Heartland Institute, 2002).
He has presented environmental analysis on the CBS Evening News, CNN, and Fox News Channel; on numerous national radio programs; and in virtually every major newspaper in the country.
Taylor received his bachelor’s degree from Dartmouth College and his law degree from the Syracuse University College of Law, where he was president of the local chapter of the Federalist Society and founder and editor-in-chief of the Federalist Voice.
Latest posts by James M. Taylor (see all)
- Dear Ivanka: Al Gore Doesn’t Have Climate Solutions, Republicans Do - December 7, 2016
- Study Confirms Natural Gas Economy Has Lower Methane, Global Warming Emissions - October 20, 2016
- Obama’s Energy Secretary Champions Nuclear Power To Fight Global Warming - September 20, 2016
[First posted at Forbes.]
In the classic movie The Shawshank Redemption, one of the most fascinating characters is the one who doesn’t exist. Peter Stevens, the silent, silent partner. A phantom. An apparition. Second cousin to Harvey the Rabbit.
When Andy Dufresne (aka Tim Robbins) concocts various frauds, scams and kickbacks for Warden Samuel Norton to enrich himself at taxpayers’ expense, Dufresne runs the paper trail through the nonexistent Peter Stevens. Dufresne conjures up Stevens and then creates all the legal documents necessary to run the tainted money through the nonexistent silent partner. If the IRS or others start investigating Warden Norton’s laundered money, they will chase after a person who simply doesn’t exist.
Dufresne explains that if people start nosing around the financial records and facts, the warden can simply point to the nonexistent culprit. “He’s the guilty one, Your Honor,” says Dufresne.
“They’ll wind up chasing a figment of my imagination,” Dufresne boasts.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) told reporters yesterday that he would like to see the U.S. Senate address climate change. At the same time, Democrat Reps. Henry Waxman (CA) and Bobby Rush (IL) wrote a letter to Chair of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce Fred Upton (R-MI) calling for hearings on an asserted link between Hurricane Sandy and global warming.
“It’s amazing what you can accomplish” when you know how to game the system, said Dufresne. He might as well have been talking about Mssrs. Reid, Waxman and Rush.
Reid, Waxman and Rush argue that global warming caused Hurricane Sandy. They talk about changes in the weather, unprecedented hurricane strikes, and massive storm damage that never used to occur.
The scientific facts, however, tell a completely different story. When a hurricane strikes the U.S. Northeast it only seems unusual because during recent decades, as global warming has gradually occurred, once-frequent Northeast hurricane strikes have almost ceased to exist.
This is especially true when we examine the real monsters, the Category 3 or higher major hurricanes. Only one major hurricane – Gloria in 1985 – has made landfall in the U.S. Northeast since 1960. By comparison, five major hurricanes made landfall in the U.S. Northeast during the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s. Hurricane Sandy, a Level 1 hurricane, pales in comparison to the monsters that frequently struck the U.S. Northeast during the cooler decades of the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s. Sure, Hurricane Sandy is now a very unusual event, but it is unusual now precisely because Northeast hurricane strikes have become less frequent and less severe during recent decades as our planet has gradually warmed.
The same trend applies to the United States as a whole. The frequency of major hurricane strikes during the past several decades is only two-thirds the frequency of major hurricane strikes during the first half of the twentieth century. Ironically, when severe weather events become less frequent, they stand out more in the public consciousness when they nevertheless do occur.
When it comes to global warming and hurricanes, we know two things to be true: (1) gradual global warming is occurring and (2) the United States is experiencing significantly fewer major storms as temperatures warm. These two facts would lead most intelligent people to conclude that if global warming is having any impact on hurricanes, it is to lessen their negative impact. Reid, Waxman and Rush, however, would like us to believe the opposite.
Andy Dufresne explained to his friend Red (aka Morgan Freeman) just how easy it is to invent a phony silent partner and perpetrate financial fraud if you know how the system works.
“Sure you can, if you know how the system works, and where the cracks are,” Dufresne explained. “It’s amazing what you can accomplish by mail. Mr. Stevens has a birth certificate, Social Security card, driver’s license… If they ever track those accounts, they’ll wind up chasing a figment of my imagination.”
I can just see Reid, Waxman and Rush similarly explaining how easy it is to invent a phony global warming scare despite scientific evidence to the contrary:
“Sure you can, if you know how the system works, and where the cracks are. It’s amazing what you can accomplish through bluster and compliant media. We’ll play on people’s fears, their unfamiliarity with the hurricane data and the fact that the media are largely silent about how the chair the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s climate variability research program reported there is little or no connection between global warming and Hurricane Sandy. Unless they take the time and effort to track these claims, they’ll wind up chasing a figment of my imagination.”
As Red said to Andy Dufresne, “Did I say you were good? You’re a Rembrandt!”