• Reasonable People
    • Joe Bast
    • Jim Lakely
    • David Applegate
    • Kendall Antekeier
    • Diane Carol Bast
    • Drew Banks
    • Andrew Barr
    • Bruno Behrend
    • Ben Boychuk
    • Alan Caruba
    • Edmund Contoski
    • Peter Ferrara
    • Matthew Glans
    • Jim Johnston
    • Jay Lehr
    • Maureen Martin
    • John Nothdurft
    • Joy Pullmann
    • James H. Rust
    • Harrison Schmitt
    • Taylor Smith
    • James M. Taylor
    • Rich Trzupek
    • Bruce Edward Walker
  • The Heartland Institute
  • Heartlander Magazine

Somewhat Reasonable

  • FacebookFacebook
  • TwitterTwitter
  • YoutubeYoutube
  • RSSRSS
  • itunesitunes
  • Budgets/Taxes
  • Environment/Energy
  • Education
  • Finance/Insurance/Real Estate
  • Health Care
  • Internet/Telecom
  • Legal Affairs

1

Environment/Energy

Uranium Mining Would Be an Environmentally Friendly Boon for Virginia and the Nation

  • by James M. Taylor
  • November 17, 2012
Tweet

[First published by the Richmond Times-Dispatch.]

Mitt Romney and Barack Obama did not agree on much during the presidential debates. One thing on which they did agree, however, is the need for the United States itself to produce more of the energy we use.

Unfortunately, environmental activists protest every new energy project proposed anywhere in the nation. They protest oil and natural gas production off the Virginia shore. They protest coal production in the western part of the state. Now they protest uranium production in southern Virginia.

Activists protest energy production beyond the state’s borders, everywhere from Florida to Alaska, from Maine to California. They will pick up local nuances in their argument, but it is the same old strategy: NIMBY (not in my backyard). While we all agree the United States should produce more of the energy we use, the same radical activists work to shut down any actual energy production.

While working to shut down energy production, environmental activists disingenuously argue in Chatham and elsewhere that they don’t oppose energy production in general. Not too long ago, they touted natural gas as a clean-burning fuel to shut down coal mining. Now, they are working to ban fracking as a means to restrict the use of natural gas. The environmentalists support wind and solar energy, but they work to ban zinc, copper, and other mined metals needed to build solar panels and wind turbines.

They simply show up in each individual community and say there are special mitigating circumstances in this particular place that make energy production particularly undesirable. The cumulative result is energy production is blocked nearly everywhere, while Republican and Democratic leaders alike point out the nation is suffering from our paltry domestic energy production.

One particularly glaring example of America needlessly failing to take advantage of its natural resources is the uranium that fuels our nuclear power plants. The United States currently imports 90 percent of the uranium we use, in spite of our abundant uranium reserves.

Under an agreement with the former Soviet Union, we imported 25 percent of our uranium with the purpose of dismantling old nuclear missiles. That program is expiring and under a new agreement, purchasers of uranium will buy mined uranium from a Russian government-owned company. Disarmament is no longer the ultimate purpose for importing uranium for our 104 nuclear power plants.

The nation’s largest untapped uranium deposit, the 14th largest in the world, sits untouched near the rural southern Virginia town of Chatham, even though the owner of the land that contains the uranium wants to mine the valuable resource. A statewide moratorium on uranium mining stands in the way.

Virginia public officials are considering lifting the ban. For the good of the nation, the state, and the Chatham region, Virginia officials should lift the moratorium.

The Chatham uranium deposit is so lucrative that mining it would increase domestic uranium production by more than 50 percent. By itself, the Chatham uranium deposit would go a long way toward making our nation energy self-sufficient. This is exactly what Republican and Democratic leaders alike say we need to do to make our nation economically strong and secure.

The people in and around Chatham would justly reap the greatest economic benefits from uranium production. A state-commissioned study found uranium mining would create $5 billion in economic activity and support 1,000 jobs. Most of that would occur in the Chatham region and benefit current residents.

The average job in Pittsylvania County today commands a salary near $39,000 per year. An employee at Coles Hill would make an average salary of $65,000 per year. Why should anyone deny this community the opportunity to improve the quality of life for its residents?

Uranium is mined safely in Arizona, Colorado, Texas, and other states. It is mined safely in Australia, Canada, Kazakhstan, and Russia. If Kazakhstan is capable of safely mining uranium, Virginia surely is, too.

A multitude of federal and state agencies would oversee uranium mining in Virginia and make sure it is safe for human health and the environment. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration are just a few of the federal agencies that would oversee and regulate any mining activities. Virginia health and environment agencies would provide additional monitoring, oversight, and regulation.

Uranium mining is a safe and economical way to boost our domestic energy production. Virginia officials should act in the best interests of the nation, state, and southern Virginia region and lift the uranium production moratorium.

Tags: uranium miningVirginia

— James M. Taylor

James M. Taylor is a senior fellow for environmental policy at The Heartland Institute and managing editor of Environment & Climate News, a national monthly publication devoted to sound science and free-market environmentalism with a circulation of approximately 75,000 readers. He is also senior fellow for The Heartland Institute focusing on environmental issues. He is author of What Climate Scientists Think about Global Warming (Heartland Institute, 2007) and coauthor of State Greenhouse Gas Programs: An Economic and Scientific Analysis (Heartland Institute, 2003) and New Source Review: An Evaluation of EPA's Reform Recommendations (Heartland Institute, 2002). He has presented environmental analysis on the CBS Evening News, CNN, and Fox News Channel; on numerous national radio programs; and in virtually every major newspaper in the country. Taylor received his bachelor’s degree from Dartmouth College and his law degree from the Syracuse University College of Law, where he was president of the local chapter of the Federalist Society and founder and editor-in-chief of the Federalist Voice.

  • Previous story Coercive, Futile Taxes Not the Answer for Cook County
  • Next story California, Illinois Double Down on Big Government

    Related Posts

  • Lt._Governor_Bolling_speaking Bill Bolling’s Motives February 22, 2013
  • US_congressional_district_2012_presidential_election Downsize the Liberals May 3, 2013
  • What’s Wrong With Virginia’s Current Regulatory Environment for Uranium Mining? What’s Wrong With Virginia’s Current Regulatory Environment for Uranium Mining? October 31, 2012
  • ronwagn

    21 Stories on the dangers of nuclear plants: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xhPQIIW9xpOwn92z5hCGshSF7e6TP3R9sFBAAg-eQe4/edit

  • Reasonable People

    Publisher/PresidentEditor-in-Chief
    Joe BastJim Lakely
    Contributors
    David ApplegateRalf Mangual
    Dave BanksMaureen Martin
    Diane Carol BastSeton Motley
    Alan CarubaJohn Nothdurft
    Paul ChesserJoy Pullmann
    Edmund ContoskiJames H. Rust
    Benjamin DomenechHarrison Schmitt
    Peter FerraraAlexandra Shanahan
    Matthew GlansTaylor Smith
    Jim JohnstonSteve Stanek
    Jay LehrJames M. Taylor
    S.T. KarnickBruce Edward Walker
  • Heartland on YouTube

    • Joseph Bast & Herbert Walberg: Education and Capitalism
      Joseph Bast & Herbert Walberg: Education and Capitalism
    • John Lott: At the Brink: Will Obama Push Us Over the Edge?
      John Lott: At the Brink: Will Obama Push Us Over the Edge?
    • Heartland
      Heartland's Jay Lehr on the Today Show: C02 Emissions (400 ppm)
  • RSS Somewhat Readable Links

    • iPencil | National Review Online
    • Eagle Scout Faces Felony for Honest Mistake
    • James Bovard: A Brief History of IRS Political Targeting - WSJ.com
    • The IRS Scandal: the Future of Big Government Is Now « Commentary Magazine
    • Lessons from the IRS scandal | Power Line
    • On the AP-Justice Department Story - Ricochet.com
    • Emptyage — Generation X Doesn't Want to Hear It
  • Obamacare Disaster
  • Tag Cloud

    2012 election al gore Barack-Obama budget California Chicago climate change climategate Congress debt ceiling economics economy education energy policy environment environmental protection agency EPA FCC federal budget federal communications commission fracking global warming green energy health care Heartland Institute internet liberty Medicaid Medicare Mitt Romney Obama Obamacare Paul Ryan politics Public Unions regulation school-reform scott walker Supreme Court Taxes teachers unions tea party unions Wisconsin Wisconsin protests
  • Heartland Websites

    The Heartland Institute
    The Heartlander
    Climate Conferences
    ClimateWiki
    Policybot
    The Parent Trigger
    Fakegate (Peter Gleick)

  • Heartland News

    Budget and Tax News
    Environment and Climate News
    FIRE Policy News
    Health Care News
    Infotech and Telecom News
    School Reform News
    Lawsuit Abuse

  • Get Reasonable

    About Us
    DONATE
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Youtube

  • Budgets/Taxes
  • Environment/Energy
  • Education
  • FIRE
  • Health Care
  • Internet/Telecom
  • Legal Affairs
  • FacebookFacebook
  • TwitterTwitter
  • YoutubeYoutube
  • RSSRSS
  • itunesitunes

Copyright The Heartland Institute