Cleland served as Deputy United States Coordinator for Communications and Information Policy in the George H. W. Bush Administration. Eight Congressional subcommittees have sought Cleland’s expert testimony and Institutional Investor twice ranked him the #1 independent analyst in his field. Scott Cleland has been profiled in Fortune, National Journal, Barrons, WSJ’s Smart Money, and Investors Business Daily. Ten publications have featured his op-eds. For a full bio see: www.ScottCleland.com.
Latest posts by Scott Cleland (see all)
- What to Expect from a Trump FCC - November 16, 2016
- Consumer Questions about FCC’s Broadband Privacy Rules — A Satire - October 30, 2016
- The Key Competitive Facts behind the AT&T-Time-Warner Acquisition - October 29, 2016
The CTIA just released its semi-annual statistics on the wireless industry’s performance, and its bad news for all those supposed data-driven, pro-regulation proponents who are in search of evidence or data to justify regulating wireless or wireless spectrum holdings.
The data are more powerful evidence of a competitive wireless industry. Hopefully, this data will nudge the FCC to begrudgingly conclude that the industry is indeed competitive, despite their blinders to the data.
Briefly, the U.S. wireless industry:
Grew five-times faster than the U.S. economy — ~9% to ~1.8% in 2012;
Invested $17.2b in capital investment in the last half of 2012 up 37% from the year before period;
Showed real competitive losses to free broadband messaging, as paid SMS text messages were down 4.9% annually in 2012, down 7.1% for last six months of 2012, and 11.3% for the last month of 2012 (Competition works!);
The amount of data usage increased 69.3% in 2012; and
The number of smart phones in use grew 36.4% in 2012.
These are data of a vibrantly competitive and innovative industry, not one in need of preemptive net neutrality or spectrum cap regulation.
[First published at The Precursor Blog]