Seton Motley
One of America's leading authorities on technology and telecom policy, Motley is a writer, television and radio commentator, political and policy strategist, lecturer, debater, activist, and policy advisor to The Heartland Institute.
Latest posts by Seton Motley (see all)
- Localities Shouldn’t Be Dictating (Inter-)National Policy - July 17, 2019
- We Are Surrounded By Intellectual Property – Until We Aren’t - July 13, 2019
- A ‘Drain The Swamp’ Test: Will The Trump Admin Reward Amazon’s Killer Cronyism? - July 11, 2019
The Supreme Court is currently considering South Dakota v Wayfair. A case debating whether or not state and municipal governments can collect their respective sales taxes – on non-resident business and people who have the temerity to complete a transaction in their jurisdictions.
President Donald Trump is on this absolutely correct – in one sense. Online retailers like the case-cited Wayfair – do have a tax-less advantage over brick-and-mortar stores in localities that impose sales taxes.
If you live in one or more sales tax jurisdictions and you shop brick-and-mortar – you pay the sales taxes. If you live there and shop Wayfair – you do not necessarily render unto Caesar. (Some online companies – Amazon, for instance – collect many of the sales taxes in much of the nation.)
Not paying sales taxes makes shopping online – (that much) more attractive. And brick-and-mortar retailers – have been understandably screaming bloody murder.
Unfortunately, they have expressed their distress and marshaled their forces – in precisely the wrong direction.
The correct answer – is to remove the sales taxes from brick-and-mortar retailers. Thereby rendering even the playing field. Oh: And less money for government – means more money for shopping.
These retailers are instead demanding the sales taxes that damage them – also be imposed upon their online competitors.
Misery loves company, I guess. But the miserable – should much prefer having their misery ended. Happiness loves company too.
The biggest problem would be the advent of governments being able to tax businesses and people – who do not live in these governments’ jurisdictions.
Taxation without representation, anyone? This would be a whole new level of obnoxious.
There are roughly 1,100 governments around the country that impose a sales tax. Imagine green-lighting all of these greedy mandarins to tax people…who can’t vote them out of office or do anything else politically about it.
The sky wouldn’t be the limit – it would be the floor of the new levels of tax imposition.
In short – this is a really terrible idea.
Which is exactly why Maryland’s Democrat-dominated legislature – is trying to do something obnoxiously similar.
Maryland is already the most-taxed-state in the nation. Their constituents are thus bled almost entirely dry. So when presented with the idea of taxing non-residents – Maryland of course ran with it:
“They have just passed a huge new tax increase. And done so – under the false flag of business tax ‘reform.’ Behold SB 1090.
“Democrat business tax ‘reform?’ We should know better – and so should (Maryland Republican Governor Larry) Hogan. Democrats don’t like business – so why would their business tax ‘reform’ do anything other than punish business?
“And here’s the obnoxious new wrinkle Democrats have added: SB 1090 increases taxes on businesses…not even incorporated in the state….
“The Democrat tax increase will be on many businesses – as much as 10%.”
A whole new way for governments to tax businesses – whose people (because businesses are just people incorporating) can’t do anything electorally about it.
I suppose you can give Maryland credit for ingenuity.
What Governor Hogan shouldn’t do – is give them his signature on the legislation.
Hogan should instead veto the living daylight out of it.
I do not consider governments coming up with new ways to tax businesses outside of their jurisdictions – “reform.”
Neither should Hogan.
[Originally Published at RedState]
