Russell Cook notes over at The American Thinker how The Heartland Institute’s one-day Unabomber billboard along a highway near Chicago “was a gift to alarmists on a silver platter.”
Noted. It was a mistake on our part. Sorry about that.
Cook gives us our lumps in his American Thinker post. But he also makes some other key points that put what some call the “Climate Wars” into perspective.
[The billboard] was illustrating absurdity with absurdity that backfired because global warming alarmists weren’t put into a defensive position of explaining why the issue is on the verge of total collapse. As Rush Limbaugh noted recently, “you never descend to the level of your opponent or they win.”
The billboard clearly did not advance the skeptic position, but it at least illustrates how the best defense is to go on the offense.
Cook faults Heartland for allowing climate alarmists to continue playing their “shell games” that “keep the public from fully comprehending the enormous faults in the idea of man-caused global warming.” Again: Guilty as charged.
But the larger story here, writes Cook, is that “alarmists have failed for nearly 20 years to prove the science is settled or that skeptics are unworthy of public trust, but they’ve only accomplished this by avoiding any debate about those assertions.”
And that gets us back to the shell game of distraction and propaganda the climate alarmists have been playing for years — with diminishing results. Writes Cook:
When a shell game tactic is the only thing global warming alarmists have to rely on to keep their issue alive, it speaks volumes about their agenda.
Read Cook’s whole piece here. Learn more about Heartland’s upcoming climate conference — May 21 – 23 in Chicago — at this link. That is the place to hear the “debate about those assertions” the alarmists are avoiding.