Biofuel

Biofuels are unsustainable in every way, but still demand – and get – preferential treatment.

Climate alarmists must prove expensive, weather-dependent energy is green and sustainable.

Ex-Grassley aide will now help Big Corn and Big Biodiesel retain their mandates and subsidies.

Replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy would inflict major land, wildlife, resource damage.

Anti-fossil fuel SCC relies on garbage models, ignores carbon benefits and hurts the poor.

Renewable energy is defective solution in search of a problem, money and power.

Despite being a politically favored source of energy, Ethanol is not the right solution to our problems.

Researcher Christine Lakatos and I, together, have produced the single largest body of work on green-energy crony-corruption. Our years of collaboration have revealed that those with special access and influence have cashed in on the various green-energy programs and benefitted from the mandates, rules, and regulations that accompany the huge scheme.

The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS)—also known as the ethanol mandate—was passed by Congress in 2005 and expanded in 2007. Regardless of market conditions, it required ever-increasing quantities of biofuel be blended into the nation’s gasoline supply—though the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) does have the flexibility to make some adjustments based on conditions, such as availability and infrastructure.

It’s planting season, and farmers are taking to the fields to put food on our tables. Even though Ted Cruz has withdrawn from the presidential race, his victory in the Iowa Caucuses caused political pundits of all stripes to speculate about the future of the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) and the corn ethanol mandate, largely because someone, Cruz, had finally campaigned against the ethanol mandate and managed to win in Iowa. While some wonks in Washington, DC may talk about a political end for the ethanol mandate, for the nation’s farmers, the biofuel bubble has already burst.