carbon dioxide

Is restricting carbon levels to zero a crime against humanity? Here’s the case that it’s exactly that.

President Trump’s courageous commitment to America first on the issue of energy emissions.

Climate science is not well developed but is quite clear on some matters despite the continued attempts by climate alarmists to obfuscate it.

Global warming activists argue carbon-dioxide emissions are destroying the planet, but the climate impacts of carbon dioxide are minimal, at worst.

The carbon dioxide tax is like the Hydra of myth.

Carbon dioxide must be an almighty gas – it gets blamed for almost every human disaster.

The researchers at CO2 Science recently summarized a 2017 study in the journal Climate that indicates across geologic history, the level of atmospheric carbon dioxide has had no relation to temperature or climate conditions.

It’s targeting conservatives. Already, a few score congressional Republicans have fallen for it.

Federal judge William Alsup recently dismissed a lawsuit by Oakland and San Francisco against oil companies for costs related to global warming.  The decision is wise, regardless of whether global warming threatens humanity’s future.

The agreement was a fraud from the start—all style, no substance.

Rather than spreading fear of increasing carbon dioxide, we should be thankful that both the Earth and humanity are thriving, in part due to more CO2.

Most Americans cringe at the thought of government enacting population control measures and plans to curb fertility rates.

In today’s crazy world, western politicians are wasting billions of tax-payer dollars force-feeding costly unreliable green energy in the bizarre belief that this will somehow change Earth’s climate.