China

The U.S. was far from the worst offender against the climate agreement.

A fortnight ago we yet again addressed the truism: Bad ideas never die – because there will always be government programs.

Shamelessly, the NBA is more enamored with making money in China than respecting the First Amendment rights of its own fans in America or standing up for American values.

As the NBA continues to protect its business interests, the league’s biggest star, Lebron James, is on a crusade of his own.

One of the very MANY problems with government regulating the private sector – is it immediately halts or severely retards private sector progress.

Chinese economic liberalization has been responsible for the biggest mass movement out of extreme poverty in human history.

Judging from the apoplectic reaction of the American media, U.S. President Donald Trump was spectacular at  the just-concluded G7 conference.

Generations of Americans have taken the ideal of free trade for granted – until the Trump administration, led by the self-described “tariff man,” turned on it and replaced it with a mercantilist strategy.

A new paper forthcoming in the journal American Economic Review: Insights estimates the effect of trade with China on American consumers and shows us what we stand to lose if we don’t end the trade war.

Federalism is too infrequently mentioned, and when it does come up, it is woefully misrepresented and abused.

The basic position of the climate “environmentalists” (CEs) on energy has long been that CO2 emissions should be drastically reduced (which, they claim, would reduce global temperatures).

You can believe that socialism is wonderful, as apparently many people do, and no one will stop you.

Contrary to some seriously misguided dismissiveness by a great many allegedly informed people – there is such a thing as a Deep State.