clean power plan

A carbon tax involves some good economics and is probably the best way to address global warming. 

Does government really need to regulate everything? Can no program be allowed to expire?

Replacing Clean Power Plan with less harmful ACE rule does not fix fraudulent CO2 science

Former Administrator Scott Pruitt’s resignation from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) marked the end of a productive but tumultuous period for the agency.

Amazing growth – while protecting environment, health and welfare from actual threats.

Despite President Trump’s efforts to shore up its fortunes, the future of coal mining and electric power generation in the United States remains tenuous at best.

Even before the ink was dry on former President Barack Obama’s signature mandating the creation of Clean Power Plan (CPP) regulations, state governments and industry were rushing to challenge the plan and block its implementation.

Cheap, abundant coal is key to national security, warm homes and wintertime survival.

EPA Secretary Scott Pruitt recently announced a withdrawal of the Clean Power Plan regulations intended to reduce electric utilities’ greenhouse gas emissions.

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt is fully justified to withdraw the Obama administration’s expensive and useless Clean Power Plan (CPP).

The agency’s carbon dioxide climate “endangerment finding” was a kangaroo court process.

John Nothdurft and Donny Kendal present episode #110 of the In The Tank Podcast. Today’s podcast features work from the Cato Institute, the Heartland Institute and the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education.

Federal and state governments pass a massive number of new rules and regulations each year, imposing billions of dollars in costs on individuals and businesses.