climate change

Will the developed country teams jointly admit to causing the world’s bad weather? Unimaginable liability looms.

A cold hungry winter is about to show Europe the deadly dangers of listening to green dreamers. It is surely time for Australia to withdraw from foreign entanglements like the Paris Treaty, and chop Canberra’s green tentacles, limiting its duties to defence, foreign affairs and maintenance of free trade (exactly as our founders intended).

How do you turn the Green Agenda on its head? Say “Class action lawsuits will save the planet.”

The core issue is whether “climate change” can be scientifically verified. If not, there is no justification for the green agenda and it should be abandoned.

Crude oil has contributed to the world populating proficiently to 8 billion. Just because two of the products manufactured from crude oil are gasoline and diesel for short-range vehicles, the consequences of abandoning all the progress after the introduction of crude oil into society, could be the greatest threat to civilization, not climate change.

Climate alarmists are using COP-26 to rewrite the already aggressive Paris Accords.

If it doesn’t, activists and governing classes will destroy middle class jobs, families and lives.

From COVID-19 alarmism to climate alarmism, Democrats are doing everything they can to economically cripple our nation.

How dare pro-life individuals and governments support banishment of fossil fuels, when their banishment would be the greatest threat to civilization resulting in billions dying from starvation, diseases, and weather-related deaths?

Don’t bother reading this book’s fanciful fear mongering.

We cannot sacrifice the economy based on bad science.

Hurricane Ida is a natural response.

Looks like the climate modeling community may have a civil war on its hands. Some serious players are rejecting the new hot models, but probably not their owners. If so we will see modeler against modeler. Be still my heart.