climate models

As a logician, I am always on the lookout for fallacies, and there is no lack of them in climate change alarmist policies. New Zealand’s newly released climate risk assessment not only has multiple fallacies, they build on one another in a cascade.

Anecdotal evidence combined with scientific theories based on solar/sunspot counts presents a strong case that it might be time for a paradigm shift concerning the factors that influence climate on earth.

Honest, evidence-based climate models could avoid trillions of dollars in policy blunders.

NASA and NOAA are like toddlers trying to fit square pegs into round holes, and just as likely as toddlers to throw fits when their efforts are stymied by reality.

Increasingly absurd disaster rhetoric is consistently contradicted by climate and weather reality.

Two new studies are throwing cold water on the argument humans are causing dangerous climate change.

You want to listen to this podcast with Heartland’s H. Sterling Burnett, and Heartland friend Big Joe Bastardi.

A new paper in Nature: Geoscience acknowledges what climate realists have long pointed out: Climate models grossly overstate the amount of measured warming and, in particular, they fail to account for a recent 18-year period in which carbon dioxide emissions rose, yet there was an extended pause in surface warming.

While some social scientists continue to undertake purported survey’s of the literature they claim show almost all scientists agree humans greenhouse gas emissions are causing dangerous climate change, real climate scientists are showing the climate is far more complex than climate models and those who rely almost solely on them to predict climate disaster acknowledge.

Climate change is real and has happened throughout history on local, regional, continent-wide, and global scales, driven by a variety of atmospheric, cosmic, geologic, and meteorological factors.

Hardly a month or even a week goes by without a new study
coming out examining another natural factor scientists have found that provably affects temperature or climate — a factor neither the climate models, nor the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have or, perhaps even can, account for.

In today’s edition of The Heartland Daily Podcast, James Wanliss, professor of physics at Presbyterian College (Clinton, SC) and senior fellow with The Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation, joins host H. Sterling Burnett to talk about the climate change debate and how we still can not trust climate models.