environment

Healthy ecosystems and life on Earth suggest ending wind, solar, biofuel and organic programs.

Misleading claims on organic food grocery bags deceive shoppers on bees and pesticides.

Those promoting the flawed idea that a complete transition from fossil fuels to an economy driven solely by wind and solar need to ask themselves “At what cost?”

It is time that developing economies stop experimenting with proven failures like wind and solar and start developing infrastructure that can address international price volatility.

By sacrificing our economy, environment, living standards, freedoms and security.

It is both amusing and fitting that these alarming climate models find wind power to be just as scary as carbon dioxide.

Whatever the cause of the temperature increases of the last 300 years, there is no need to fear carbon dioxide’s future greenhouse effect.

Saving the planet must not mean rejecting fossil fuels to meet such needs. Otherwise, the clarion call of environmental activists is the death knell for the billions they would condemn to energy poverty.

Chasing out power producers with EPA regulations only hurts the economy and American citizens.

Which side will Colorado be on this time? Will its officials defend its water, or knuckle under to federal control?

Major energy companies certainly have the resources and expertise to defend their vital contributions, as well as to expose the lie that additional atmospheric CO2 is causing a climate crisis.

As banks collude on ESG policies to reshape economies so that they are in line with the preferences of banks and other financial institutions to divest in all 3 fossil fuels, it is a very dangerous precedent.

Growing the supply chain for EV’s without a corresponding growth in demand, could be an economic disaster in the works.