Europe

President Trump should direct USAID to support coal and gas, not just wind and solar.

The U.S. was far from the worst offender against the climate agreement.

Political election seasons are always interesting times.

From Alberta to Australia, from Finland to France, and beyond, voters are increasingly showing their displeasure with expensive energy policies imposed by politicians in an inane effort to purportedly fight human-caused climate change.

It’s a cornerstone of political economy that producers and traders need stable rules.

Russia is once again actively trying to influence the policies of foreign governments, though this time, the target is Europe, not the United States.

European witch hunts of the 15th to 17th centuries targeted witches that were thought to be responsible for epidemics and crop failures related to declining temperatures of the Little Ice Age.

It has been said that economists have predicted “nine of the last five recessions,” or words to that effect, suggesting that the “dismal science” can’t be trusted.

No single party or pre-election coalition received enough votes to enter parliament with a majority coalition, in the just concluded Italian general election.

Agriculture is under attack.

World leaders at the recent G-20 summit presented a mostly unified front against President Donald Trump in retaliation for his decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris climate agreement.

America’s Founding Fathers did not encourage unlimited immigration, but neither did they prevent or discourage it by any federal legislation.  They believed most decisions should be left to individual states to regulate.

Even when environmentalists admit wind power is more expensive than conventional fuel sources—and they often lie and claim it isn’t—wind advocates argue its environmental benefits are worth the added costs.