fossil fuels

When true believers in the theory that humans are causing dangerous climate change propose costly, liberty restricting, fixes to reduce or mitigate the disastrous harms they project will result from climate change, they almost always scrupulously avoid discussing, the negative impacts of the climate fixes they propose.

Earth’s climate is never still – it is always changing, with long-term trends, medium-term reversals and minor oscillations.

Federal judge William Alsup recently dismissed a lawsuit by Oakland and San Francisco against oil companies for costs related to global warming.  The decision is wise, regardless of whether global warming threatens humanity’s future.

African Development Bank breaks with anti-fossil fuel banks to fund coal power, prosperity.

It seems that Pope Francis has learned little since his 2015 papal encyclical calling on the world to fight climate change by limiting the use of modern technologies and fossil fuels.

The ongoing, rolling fact is – “green energy”…is neither green nor energy.

Tom Steyer, a billionaire former hedge fund manager from San Francisco has all the passion and fiery proselytistic zeal of those who have experienced a Pauline-like conversion.

Opponents make compelling case but can’t derail or even slow this well-protected industry.

Most Americans cringe at the thought of government enacting population control measures and plans to curb fertility rates.

Elections have consequences, and in the energy and environmental policy areas, the consequences resulting from the election of Donald Trump have been profound.

States should avoid imposing dubious “social cost of carbon” rules.

Poverty remains, by far, the biggest killer of humans, and government-imposed regulations have been proven to create economic costs that make poverty more likely.

The preferential dispatch system used by many RTO/ISO grid operators favors wind and solar to the exclusion of critical baseload power from fossil fuel and nuclear power plants.