Fred Singer

Following in the footsteps of the late Michael Crichton (State of Fear), Fernandez has woven a hair-raising murder mystery into an accurate explanation of what we really know about the planet’s present and future climate.

Common sense dictates that federal agencies must assess both the costs and the benefits of the intended regulations, and recognizing that some costs and benefits are difficult to quantify, propose or adopt a regulation only upon a reasoned determination that the benefits of the intended regulation justify the cost.

Is man-made global warming a crisis? Don’t just wonder about it, understand it yourself. Read one or a few chapters of one of the NIPCC reports, and ask if what you read is logical, factual, and relevant to the debate.

The Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) will issue its critique of the United Nations’ IPCC Working Groups II and III Reports at National Press Club on April 9.

The 1,015-page Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science has been making waves across the non-warming globe, and the undertow is infinitely annoying to the eco-left.

As part of the media tour for Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science, two scientists from the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), stopped by the studios of U-T TV in San Diego.

Two of the most esteemed climate scientists in the world discuss “Climate Change Reconsidered” with Heartland Institute President Joseph Bast.

This is probably the most important report on climate change ever produced. Its breadth and depth rival that of the IPCC’s reports. Its authors have no agenda except to find the truth.

The Heartland Institute will host a “book launch luncheon” on Sept. 18 featuring two of the report’s lead authors. More details of the unveiling of “Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science,” will be released in the coming weeks.

Michael Mann should be careful about promoting a commentary criticizing others over how one attracts co-authors and reviewers to scientific work.

Quoting from another movie review:  “… there’s a lot to be angry about. And though Rosebraugh shines a light on plenty of jaw-dropping corruption, it plays out like a shrill rallying…

PBS aired a “Frontline” episode last night titled “Climate of Doubt.” The show’s producer (but not the host, John Hockenberry) attended Heartland’s Seventh International Conference on Climate Change in May,…

In today’s American Spectator, I outline the politicization of climate science, and note one of the media’s most well-guarded secrets: that scientists continue to poke holes in the theory of…