green new deal

Green Deal proposals are springing up around the world. The core concept is zero CO2 emissions via decarbonization. The proponents of these Green Deals deliberately avoid cost estimates because the costs are horrendous.

Proponents of the Green New Deal (GND) tell us that increasing human carbon dioxide emissions are fueling a dangerous rise in worldwide temperature. They failed to convince the public.

The vast sums proposed to be spent under dubious national Green New Deals should be spent instead on health care, especially virus prevention and protection.

AOC’s recent comments, along with the actual text of Green New Deal bill, are at odds with numerous facts about pollution, regulations, and the economics of energy.

“Mattress Mack” bet a total of $13 million on the Houston Astros winning the World Series, not because he’s such a fan, but to cover his business losses if that were to happen.

In 2008, Rahm Emanuel, then-president-elect Barack Obama’s newly named chief of staff, uttered the infamous phrase: “You never let a serious crisis go to waste.”

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions to curb climate change will require enormous sacrifice. 

Many of my friends have long referred to environmentalists as “watermelons” — green on the outside, red on the inside.

The “Red for Ed” movement is becoming redder by the day.

Last week, the New York City Council approved a resolution declaring a climate emergency that it hopes will mobilize efforts to forestall the devastation of purported global warming from greenhouse gas emissions.  

After more than two centuries of (somewhat) limited government in the United States, is the tide turning against individual freedom and state sovereignty in favor of an empowered collective and unfettered federal power?

The Green New Deal (GND) has been costed at almost $100 trillion by very knowledgeable experts, or about half of total gross national product over the ten years involved.

Shutting down middle and blue-collar America.