greenhouse gases

A carbon tax involves some good economics and is probably the best way to address global warming. 

A group of distinguished economists, including Nobel prize winners and past Council of Economic Advisors members, recently supported a carbon tax. 

Most Americans cringe at the thought of government enacting population control measures and plans to curb fertility rates.

The tax cut Congress and President Trump delivered to the American people in late December is already paying dividends.

Dr. Arturo Casadevall and Dr. Ferric C. Fang correctly distilled down the scientific method into a five word query: “but what if I’m wrong?

A recent study by researchers at the University of California Los Angeles examines the impact the family dog or cat has on greenhouse-gas emissions.

The gaseous emissions of a misanthrope.

Anaerobic digesters (ADs) aren’t cheap and aren’t green. The cost of the energy produced by ADs is far higher than energy generated by traditional fossil fuels, and ADs create their own environmental problems.

Continuing to focus on carbon dioxide as the driving force will just bring more bogus predictions.

Having achieved major goals, US should refocus EPA and other environmental agencies.

Isaac Orr, has written and spoken extensively concerning how the increased use of natural gas to generate electricity due to the steep decline in natural gas prices because of the fracking revolution has resulted in a dramatic decline in greenhouse gas emissions in the United States.

The prospects for significant reductions in greenhouse gases has received a major boost, as scientists report methane emissions from fossil fuels have not increased, even with a substantial increase in natural gas production.