regulations

Chasing out power producers with EPA regulations only hurts the economy and American citizens.

Nominees for government office should be automatically disqualified if they envision radical institutional changes for the office they intend to run.

Trump is exactly right that problems trace to preposterous government regulations designed to save water that actually end up using more, and not dealing with the real problem which has nothing to do with domestic water use. 

While running for the presidency in 2016, Donald Trump promised to provide relief to the stifling regulations that at-best delay and at-worst completely halt infrastructure projects.

True to President Donald Trump’s campaign promise to reduce the federal government’s regulatory burden on the nation’s manufacturers, the performance of the first two years of the Trump administration appears to have met with this sector’s general approval.

Does government really need to regulate everything? Can no program be allowed to expire?

Technological advances touch every aspect of our lives, often in ways we rarely think about.

When true believers in the theory that humans are causing dangerous climate change propose costly, liberty restricting, fixes to reduce or mitigate the disastrous harms they project will result from climate change, they almost always scrupulously avoid discussing, the negative impacts of the climate fixes they propose.

Recently I attended the launch by Scott Pruitt of the EPA’s new Office of Continuous Improvement (and, as proof, you can see me in the background of this official photo).

Despite President Trump’s efforts to shore up its fortunes, the future of coal mining and electric power generation in the United States remains tenuous at best.

United States’ governments at all levels have for decades been at war with America and Americans.

Poverty remains, by far, the biggest killer of humans, and government-imposed regulations have been proven to create economic costs that make poverty more likely.

The agency’s carbon dioxide climate “endangerment finding” was a kangaroo court process.