renewable energy

Concerns over impacts from energy projects disappear where “green” energy is involved…

Renewable energy advocates free and competitive markets are to blame for coal-fired power plants being replaced by natural gas and wind generation

With much of the world impoverished, starving, lacking access to clean water, and living under authoritarian regimes, Western Nations have decided that generating “clean power” is of the utmost importance.

It drives anti-fossil fuel agendas and threatens wildlife, jobs, and human health and welfare.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel used her closing speech at the recent G-20 summit as a pulpit to chide President Donald Trump for his decision to withdraw from the Paris climate accord.

Life without oil, natural gas and coal would most likely be nasty, brutish and short.

The luster is coming off wind power as an economically viable, environmentally friendly, community-friendly source of America’s energy future—and for some very good reasons.

Government cutting special deals for special friends – is always obnoxious, obnoxiously bad policy.

California’s lofty goal of renewable energy is nothing more than a pipe dream.

Pittsburgh’s Democratic Mayor Bill Peduto recently claimed that despite Trump leaving Paris, the city is still committed to renewable energy.

How we power our nation should be, like everything else, as free market as possible. May the most effective, cheapest energy sources win

Public policy officials, do not be duped. The next time somebody claims wind and solar power create more jobs than natural gas and other conventional energy sources, ask them for specific definitions and parameters of the job numbers cited.

Two recent articles that caught my eye this week highlight the positive aspects of our changing climate and the weaknesses in the claims made by those who argue we can replace fossil fuels for electric power with current off-the-shelf technologies.