science

While peer review has its good side, there are several ways that it greatly impedes progress, and the bad greatly outweighs the good.

National Academies of Science should speak out against climate alarmism, not support it. The integrity of science is at stake.

Anecdotal evidence combined with scientific theories based on solar/sunspot counts present a strong case that it might be time for a paradigm shift concerning the factors that influence climate on earth.

There seems to be an inclination among policy-makers that adherence to evidence-based policy-making is a luxury we can only afford when not in a crisis.

More than three decades before Greta Thunberg was born — the Swedish environmental activist on climate change, diagnosed with Asperger’s — more than 20 million Americans participated in the first Earth Day on April 22, 1970.

Is restricting carbon levels to zero a crime against humanity? Here’s the case that it’s exactly that.

President Trump vowed to increase transparency concerning how federal agencies operate and impose rules.

American innovation, private property rights and capitalism have led to a revolutionary sea change in the energy landscape by developing the vast oceans of natural gas through horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing.

Hecklers protested the U.S. event on fossil fuels but nobody bothered the Africans when they promoted the role of oil and gas in national development.

Under a renewable energy proposal from Northern Indiana Public Service Company (NIPSCO), Indiana consumers would face a 12 percent electricity rate hike, which will cost the average household more than $100 per year in additional electricity costs.

In the era of self-driving cars, big data and increasingly sophisticated bio-medical advances, the age-old question of how regulation can keep up with technology is more relevant than ever.

Lesson: Cookies induce happiness

House hearing investigates a UN cancer agency accused of misusing US taxpayer funds.